24. This is dependent on the devices used, the scale (how big an
impact in terms of culture volume the sampling might have),
and sampling frequency. In particular for low volume bioreac-
tors, the loss of volume due to sampling can have an impact on
overall performance.
25. Mainly two feeding modes are used: Continuous feeding,
which means constantly adding a small amount of feed
(s) once the feed addition has been initiated using a low flow
pump (this is usually performed using a connected scale to be
able to control the amount added in 24 h). Alternatively, the
feeds are added in bolus mode, meaning that feeds are added at
a pre-defined interval (usually once per day once the feed
addition has been initiated) as a short burst. This requires less
automation as the pump could be activated by hand and
stopped when the target weight is reached. Continuous feed-
ing is smoother for the culture but requires more infrastructure
to be precise. Importantly, it is generally not possible to test
this approach in a less automated format like shake flask.
26. Addition of antifoam once to completely remove the foam is
more efficient than putting multiple small doses. If foam is not
controlled, clogging of the filter could occur.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank David Hacker for his input and support in
writing this chapter and Eppendorf AG for providing images used
in the creation of the figures.
References
1. Chu
L,
Robinson
DK
(2001)
Industrial
choices for protein production by large-scale
cell
culture.
Curr
Opin
Biotechnol
12
(2):180–187
2. Li F, Vijayasankaran N, Shen AY, Kiss R, Ama-
nullah A (2010) Cell culture processes for
monoclonal antibody production. MAbs 2
(5):466–479
3. Zhu J (2012) Mammalian cell protein expres-
sion for biopharmaceutical production. Bio-
technol Adv 30(5):1158–1170
4. Wurm F (2004) Production of recombinant
protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian
cells. Nat Biotechnol 22:1393–1398
5. Kunert R, Reinhart D (2016) Advances in
recombinant antibody manufacturing. Appl
Microbiol Biotechnol 100:3451–3461
6. Castan A, Schlutz P, Wenger T, Fischer S
(2018) Chapter 7—Cell line development.
Biopharmaceuticals
processing.
ISBN
9780081006238
7. Herna´ndez Rodrı´guez T, Frahm B (2020)
Design, optimization, and adaptive control of
cell culture seed trains. Methods Mol Biol
2095:251–267
8. van der Valk J, Brunner D, De Smet K, Fex
Svenningsen A, Honegger P, Knudsen LE,
Lindl T, Noraberg J, Price A, Scarino ML,
Gstraunthaler
G
(2010)
Optimization
of
chemically defined cell culture media—repla-
cing fetal bovine serum in mammalian in vitro
methods. Toxicol In Vitro 24(4):1053–1063
9. Shukla AA, Gottschalk U (2012) Single-use
disposable technologies for biopharmaceutical
14
Ange´ lique Schmid et al.